Course Philosophy:
Reconstructing Mathematics Understanding

Let's suppose that as elementary teachers we need to know as much of mathematical content as a solid high school student. We do not have to be able to teach high school students, but being able to read high school mathematics should be one of our goals. That way we will know what we are preparing our students for and what steps they will need to take from a kindergarten's AB pattern to understanding, for example, the difference between linear and exponential growth.

Quality and depth of our learning depends on our ability to think about our own thinking and learning; to foster our own metacognitive reflection. Are you aware of some strategies that promote metacognition?

As teachers we want to be independent life long learners. That involves a collection of skills that are often named as autonomous learning skills. What might these skills be?

This class is about learning mathematics for understanding in an environment that nurtures development of autonomous learning skills and promotes metacognition.

What is your challenge/concern after reading this? What are possible misconceptions surfacing from this philosophy? Think about it. Talk with your colleagues about it. Email me. Let’s discuss it in class.

 

Wichita State University 

CI 319 Mathematics Investigations

Instructor: Dr. Mara Alagic

 

Fall 2005

 

Faculty Member: Dr. Mara Alagic         

Office: 134 Hubbard Hall   

Office Hours: Thursday 10:00 - 11:00 Room 251 Corbin; other times by appointment (134 Hubbard Hall)         

Telephone:  (316) 978-6974  

E-mail Address:  mara.alagic@wichita.edu

Department: Curriculum and Instruction

Note: Weather Cancellations – Call 978-6633 (select 2) to obtain information on weather related class cancellations.

Course Title: Mathematical Investigations (2 credit hours)

Catalog Description: This course is founded on National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (nctm.org) principles and standards for school mathematics. It will model an investigative problem-based approach to mathematics focusing on process standards: problem solving, reasoning and proof, communication, connections and multiple representations. Students should gain an active understanding of problem-posing and problem-solving in mathematics, as well as a familiarity with heuristics for problem-solving. Course will also utilize appropriate technology-based cognitive tools.

Prerequisites: MATH 501 Mathematics for Elementary teachers

 Major Topics:

Mathematical Processes:

Cognitive science: How people learn mathematics?

What is mathematical understanding? What’s THE right way to teach mathematics? Doesn’t every mathematics classroom look the same? How can I assess and evaluate my students’ learning? How can I effectively use technology within my mathematics program? How can I add breadth, depth, and dimension to my students’ mathematical learning?

 

Technology Expectations:  CORE 2 students will be able to

 

Learner Outcomes

 

Related Assessment

KSDE Elementary Education Standards

National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (NCTM) standards

Conceptual Framework Connections

(Guiding Principles)

 

 

 

 

 

The student demonstrates the ability to use effective, developmentally appropriate instructional strategies to help all k-6 students learn and use their mathematical skills in many different situations and applications to solve real life problems.

Digital file/resource

S2-P3

Teaching Principle;

Technology Principle

HDD

The student knows a variety of developmentally appropriate assessment tools that align with curriculum and instruction.

Digital file/resource

S2-K4

Assessment Principle

HDD
CTA

The student uses diverse and developmentally appropriate assessments that align with curriculum and instruction.

Digital file/resource

S2-P4

Equity Principle

HDD
CTA

The student knows and understands the mathematical concepts of number sense, number systems and their properties, computation, geometric figures and their properties, transformational geometry, measurement, data analysis, data representations, probability, patterns, functions, and representations of algebraic and geometric situations/solutions.

Digital file/resource

S2-K1

Content standards: Number sense and operations, Algebra, Geometry, Measurement, Data analysis and probability

CKS

T

The student understands the five process standards (problem solving, reasoning and proof, communication, connections and representations).

Digital file/resource

S2-K2

Process standards

CKS

T

Appropriate to k-6 students' age and development, the student can use and apply, demonstrate, and teach the concepts of number sense, number systems and their properties, computation, geometric figures and their properties, transformational geometry, measurement, data analysis, data representations, probability, patterns, functions, representations of algebraic and geometric situations/solutions.

Digital file/resource

S2-P3

Curriculum Principle

HDD

CKS

T

The student integrates the five process standards (problem solving, reasoning and proof, communication, connections and representations) into math instruction.

Digital file/resource

S2-P4

Curriculum Principle

HDD
CKS
T

 Required Readings

  1. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.(2000). Principles and Standards for School Mathematics. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. Reston, VA  (also available online at http://standards.nctm.org/document/index.htm

Recommended Readings

  1. Math 501 textbook (any version)

  2. National Research Council (2000). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. Washington, DC: National Academy Press. 

  3. Daniels, H. & Bizar, M. (1998). Methods that matter: Six structures for best practice classrooms. York, ME: Stenhouse.

  4. Carpenter, T. P., Fennema, E., Franke, M. L., Levi, L., & Empson  S. B. (1999). Children's Mathematics: Cognitively Guided Instruction. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemen

 

ASSESSMENTS
Assignments Assessment tool & points Due dates Points
Class participation  (required readings are also scheduled within the calendar) check list;
15 days x 10 
ongoing 150 points
Reflections
(Bb - reflective pods)
check list;
15 weeks x 10
weekly - due by Sunday midnight (each Pod has to decide how much time they will provide for a person summarizing) 150 points 
Self Evaluations (include your grades - spreadsheet) check list;
2 entries x
50
October 1, November 5 100 points
Problem sets rubric;
5 entries x100
September 8, September 29, October 20, November 10,  December 1 500 points 
Final Exam - presentations rubric;
1 entry x 100

December 13 8:00 – 9:50

100 points 
Completed Digital Resource File (5 problem sets and Final Exam) with corrections incorporated (to the best of your potential/time) is due at the time of your presentation.
Total possible (tentative) 1000 points

NOTE: Late work will NOT be accepted. Plan your personal due dates accordingly.

READINGS DISCUSSION

The following readings from PSSM are required. Additional recommended readings extend to the same topic within the PSSM textbook and further to the content standards. Be ready to discuss in details each of the readings. Instead of discussion an occasional quiz will be given over these readings.  

  1.  -- Process Standards: p.52 – 67

  2.  -- Problem Solving: p. 334 - 342

  3. -- Reasoning and proof: p. 342 - 348

  4. -- Representation: p. 360 - 364

  5.  -- Connections: p. 354 -360

  6.  -- Communication: p. 348 - 354

REFLECTIONS

You are a member of a Reflective Pod (online group on the Blackboard site for this class). Your weekly entry will consist of your reflective postings on (a) the topic assigned and (b) the readings of postings of other pod-members. Every week one person, on a rotating basis, summarizes. Read rubric carefully to better understand requirements.

Online Discussions

Emerging
3 pts

Competent
5 pts

Exemplary
10 pts

Substantive Postings

Contributes to the discussion but offers no new ideas

Contributes one idea that is original to the discussion

Contributes more than one idea that is original to the discussion

Acknowledging Ideas of Others

Recognizes the contribution of another with agree/disagree statement

Recognizes the contribution of another and provides some reason for agreement/disagreement

Recognizes the contribution of another and expands on the idea with further examples OR  uses examples to explain reason for disagreement

Supporting Ideas

 

One idea supported with an example from personal experience or from other resources

More than one idea supported with an example from personal experiences or from other resources
OR
One idea is supported with multiple examples from personal experiences and/or other resources

More than one idea supported with multiple examples from personal experiences and from other resources

Timely Contributions

Posting done but not on schedule

At least one substantive (competent level) posting completed on time

At least two substantive (competent level) postings completed on time and with separation of at least 24 hours

The rubric above is constructed to guide you in self-evaluation of your contributions to your Online Discussion Group. I hope this will encourage creative, high quality discussions related to the learning of mathematics. I hope to build a community of learners engaged in joint knowledge building through discussion. In order to build such a community it is important to include discussions about the broader context of your lives as future teachers and life-long learners. Therefore, I encourage you to broaden your discussions outside of the required reflective discussions.

You will be turning in your scores with self-evaluation. I will periodically check the scores with reference to your actual online contributions.

SELF-EVALUATION

You may choose your own format but it has to include enough detail for me to understand how you are progressing in this class; at least one paragraph long report on each of the following questions. For the full number of points, question #1 will probably require more than one paragraph - select concepts that you find most significant, and go from there...:

  1. What did I learn? Be very specific and give enough details. Think about this as being a test on what you have learned so far. Or, if you do not like tests, consider this a journal entry about the mathematics content knowledge and mathematics-specific pedagogical content knowledge (scaffolding) that you have acquired so far. Carefully select what you want to write about (2-3 concepts). Remember to support your statements.

  2. What would I like to learn/change?  be very specific. Include dispositions (both for yourself and me).

  3. The following two weeks I will focus on . . .  What can YOU do to enhance your learning related to this class? Include dispositions (both for yourself and me).

  4. What is your point-average at this moment? How do you feel about it? (Attach a spreadsheet with your grades; include self-evaluation for online reflective journaling).

THE DIGITAL RESOURCE FILE

THE DIGITAL RESOURCE FILE

is a collection of student’s works in digital format, focusing on problem-based learning. Completed file has to be  Technology will be used both as a presentation and integration tool. The resource file consists of the two required components: 5 Problem-sets and Final Exam Presentation.

1.  5 Problem-sets:

Each problem set  starts with an open-ended, real-life related challenging problem focusing on a big mathematical idea  (grades 8-12). The problem-set continues with additional, at least 7 word/story problems scaffolding down the main concept.

  • appropriate solutions  

  • scaffolding for conceptual understanding   

  • concepts defined in clear and precise language

  • clear list of key concepts/vocabulary  

  • See the Problem sets grading rubric (below) for further details.

    Each problem set utilize technology tools in an essential way (e.g. multi-media, digital manipulatives, graphing calculators, spreadsheets, dynamic geometry). More details will be provided in class.

    Problem sets: Grading rubric

     CI 319

    Problem Designation:

    Excellent

    Mediocre

    Acceptable

    Non-acceptable

    Challenge problem selection and quality of its solution
    20pt
    The following attributes met:  open-ended, real-life related, significant mathematical idea/concept addressed;  Each step of the solution identified and justified At least 3 attributes met At least 2 attribute met Less than  2 attributes met
    Scaffolding - representations leading to the main concept
    20pt
    Rich collection of simpler word problems leading step-by-step to the challenge (at least 7 problems) A collection of a couple of simpler problems leading to the challenge Development of representations incomplete None of the attributes met
    Quality of the solutions
    20pt
    All solution steps and corresponding justification details included Some solution steps OR corresponding justification details missing Some solution steps AND corresponding justification details missing None of the attributes met
    Vocabulary
    10pt
    Precise connections; Concepts clearly introduced after an experience provided with a challenge problem (or other). Connections not precisely introduced; OR Concepts introduced before activities/experiences Connections not precisely introduced; AND Concepts introduced before activities/experiences  None of the attributes met
    ICT tools/virtual manipulatives
    10pt
    ICT representation appropriate for the task, interactivity clearly described Not interactive (electronic work sheet) Insignificant value of the ICT integration None of the attributes met
    References
    5pt
    Detailed references (APA style) Basics Incomplete Not included
    Metacognitive Reflection
    15pt
    Justification: What is the main quality of this set?  What did you learn in terms of (a) content (b) yourself? Transfer ideas? How are problems connected? Justification incomplete;
    Unclear possible resolutions
    Justification incomplete or unclear; Obstacles not recognized; No ideas for resolutions Not included

    Essential recommendation: Support each of the statements you make with a very specific detail.

     

     Criteria: Each student will demonstrate an acceptable or better rating on each of the entries.

    2.      Presentation (Final Exam)

    Presentation  in class as part of the final exam should include

    See the Presentation grading rubric (below) for further details.

     

    Presentation: Grading Rubric

      Emerging
    5 pts
    Competent
    15 pts
    Exemplary
    25 pts
    Challenging problem Have a problem and a    solution Clearly stated challenging problem and a solution Creative, attractive presentation of a clearly stated problem and a solution
    Interactivity (ICT) Powerpoint website that supports challenging problem the class is engaged in that activity during presentation (internet, GSP)
    Artifact Mentioned Poster, game, manipulative, .. Engaging audience, well connected to the problem
    Metacognitive reflection (all problem sets) Reflective statement - not clear metacognitive connection One well supported metacognitive reflective statement A couple of well supported metacognitive reflective statements

    Certification Requirements: Both the state of Kansas and national accreditation requires that university programs for the preparation of teachers and other school personnel be performance-based. In particular, this requires that students not only pass required courses/attain certain GPAs, but also receive satisfactory ratings on certain required assessments, many of those embedded within program coursework.
    One or more of those required assessments occur in this course. A title/description of any assessments and associated rubrics and passing criteria follows:

    Students failing to attain a satisfactory rating on a required assessment may be provided special assistance. The university is not able, however, to recommend individuals for licensure who fail to attain a satisfactory rating on required assessments, even though they may receive an acceptable course grade or exceed minimum GPAs.

    Academic Honesty: A standard of honesty, fairly applied to all students, is essential to a learning environment.  Students abridging a standard of honesty must accept the consequences; penalties are assessed by appropriate classroom instructors or other designated people.  Serious cases may result in discipline at the college or University level and may result in suspension or dismissal.  Dismissal from a college for academic dishonesty, constitutes dismissal from the University. (WSU Student Code of Conduct)

    Special Needs: ADA:  If you have a physical, perceptual, psychiatric/emotional, medical, or learning disability that may impact your ability to carry out assigned course work, contact the Office of Disability Services (DS), Grace Wilkie Annex, room 173.  (Voice/TDD 978-3309).  ODS will review your concerns, confirm your disability, and determine, with you, what accommodations are necessary.  All information and documentation of your disability is confidential and will not be released by DS without your written permission.

     

      CALENDAR

    August        September          October      November

    August

    Problem Posing and Problem Solving: What do non-routine, ill-posed mathematics projects look like?

    18

    Introductions -
    Volume activity

    1. Which one holds more (engaging, not open-ended challenge)?

    2. Introduce the concept/vocabulary

    3. Discuss briefly conceptual understanding of volume

    Course philosophy - syllabus
    Learning goals for this course

    Rubric for problem sets
    Rubric for online reflections

    Reflective pods:

    a.     Group name

    b.     Positive experiences about learning mathematics & science

    c.     Summarize on a rotating basis (alphabetic order)

    HW: Get familiar with the syllabus; Go carefully over the problem set rubric
    READ: Process Standards: p. 52 – 67

    25

    ONLINE ASSIGNMENT: Pose a real-life related open-ended problem about volume in your discussion group space; Explain why you think that is a valuable problem. The problem should be on your developmental level. Challenge yourself!

    After all group members posted a problem, decide as a group which problem (and solution) you will share next time in class. Each member will have to contribute to the presentation - decide who is doing what.

    Reflective pods: Reflection #2
    My favorite mathematics concept is ... because...

    HW: READ  Problem Solving: p. 334 - 342

    September

    Multiple Representations: Open-ended, rich problems 

    1 READINGS DISCUSSION: Process Standards: p. 52 – 67
    READINGS DISCUSSION: Problem Solving: p. 334 - 342

    Which one holds more? Let's sort them from "the most" to "the least" according to the amount of rice that they can hold.

    A problem solving challenges:

    http://matti.usu.edu/nlvm/nav/frames_asid_273_g_3_t_4.html
    http://matti.usu.edu/nlvm/nav/vlibrary.html

    Reflective pods: Reflection #3

    HW: READ  Problem Solving: p. 334 - 342

    8

    READINGS DISCUSSION: Representation: p. 360 - 364
    Linear vs. exponential Growth
    Keeping track of grades - Spreadsheets

    KNOWLEDGE TRANSFER:
    standards <<>>problem sets
    classroom work<<>>problem sets
    prior knowledge<<>>problem sets

    15

    READINGS DISCUSSION:  Connections: p. 354 - 360
    Estimation: Linear vs. exponential Growth - What does it really mean?
    Geometer's Sketchpad: What can I do with it?

    Reflection #5: Volume and Connections
    Reflect on Connections standard (see reading for this week) in the context of designing your Volume Problem Set. Remember that connections can be made within mathematics and with disciplines outside of mathematics. Share YOUR understanding of this standard (do not copy phrases from the book into your reflection) and provide specific examples from your problem set to illustrate your understanding. Think of yourself as a learner/student not as a teacher.

    22 READINGS DISCUSSION: Communication: p. 348 - 354
    Work in pairs: Design a word problem addressing exponential growth and using spreadsheets. Write up a solution and design a graph to represent your solution. Email me that and be ready to share.

    Geometry Preassessment - rhombus problem

    Geometer's Sketchpad: Geometric transformations; Geometric properties; Ratio and proportions

    HOMEWORK: Read geometry standard and geometry handout
                                Go to the lab and play with Geometer sketchpad
     

    ONLINE REFLECTION: Reflect on problem solving standard in the context of designing your Volume Problem Set. Think of yourself as a learner/student and relate the process of designing to significant problem solving characteristics and strategies.

    NEXT:
    self-evaluation + reflections + problem sets (one more has to be on a geometry concept including GSP as a technology tool)

    29

    Van Hiele's levels
    Rhombus problem

    Geometer's Sketchpad: Geometric transformations; Geometric properties; Ratio and proportions
     

    ONLINE REFLECTION: What happens if you take a piece of paper cut it in half, then cut these two halves into halves and continue the process forever. Describe that process mathematically (mathematical representation or model). Think of different ways of doing this. Are there similar processes in the nature.

    October

    Reasoning and Proof: Inductive and deductive reasoning; What constitutes a mathematical proof at different levels of understanding?

    6

    Geometer's Sketchpad: Triangle Properties - median, sum of interior angles, exterior angles property

     

    ONLINE REFLECTION:

    Scaffolding Geometry: Browse through geometry standard in your textbook. Focus on scaffolding ideas from grade k to grade 8.  Select a concept that is appropriate for grade 8 (according to NCTM standards) and describe how you would scaffold it up to grade 8 through just a few (2-3) scaffolds. (NOTE: It is not necessary to match exactly with some grades between k and 8; just focus on the complexity of details/properties/formulas as you scaffold).

    13

    Geometer's Sketchpad: GSP: Triangles and their properties - incenter, orthocenter, circumcenter

    ICT interactive:

    (a) What is the difference between an interactive website and an electronic work sheet? What makes an ICT/computer-based activity interactive? Provide examples.

    (b) Which attributes of spreadsheets and dynamic geometry (such as GSP) make these tools interactive? Describe/list them and support your statements.

    Next problem set: Geometry topic of your choice

    Q: How can you adapt GSP activities that we did in class for K-6 grade levels. Think very broadly, at first: triangle properties, angles, segments, ...

    20 Geometer's Sketchpad: Geometric transformations; Geometric properties; Ratio and proportions

    Reflection #10: Teaching for conceptual understanding

    This week each group member will write an essay (not less than 300 words) on the assigned topic and post it for other members to be able to read it. It is expected that at least two resources be used and referenced. You can post your complete essay at one time (no need for 2 entries this week) and it is not necessary to have a summary. Topics are assigned in the order listed below.

    First group member: Open-ended problems

    Second group member: Scaffolding

    Third group member: Metacognitive reflection

    Fourth group member: Conceptual Understanding

     

    27

    WHY EFFECTIVE TEACHERS ANSWER QUESTIONS WITH QUESTIONS?

     What KIND of questions? 

    *   Benefits

    *   Challenges

    *   Addressing Challenges

    Due date adjustment - PS4 due November 17; I will give you a challenging problem (topic - select a mathematical concept emerging from Pascal's triangle and fitting with the assigned challenge problem)

    Reflection #11: “intellectual fire”

    A student wrote in her self-evaluation that there is no “intellectual fire” in her reflective group discussions. Are you experiencing the same thing?

    (a) If yes, try to explain why this might be happening (without blaming your teacher or your peers). Assuming that you cannot do much about extrinsic factors, what can you do about intrinsic factors?

    (b) If not, provide support; how are you keeping your discussions at an appropriate/challenging intellectual level? What triggers your intellectual fire? Intrinsic or extrinsic factors?

    November

    Communications: Language of Mathematics

    3
    1. Process standards - reflecting on reading - design a problem and take it through different process standards
    2. Represent a^2-b^2= (a+b)(a-b) visually; what does this expression mean in geometry?
    3. Mathematical expressions vs. mathematical equation
    4. Pascal's triangle - discovery approach
    5. Connecting with binomial formulae
    6. Searching for patterns; connecting with exponents of 2; Fibonaci's numbers, ...
    7. Multiplication Table and Pascal's triangle using spreadsheets
    10
  • PS#4: CHALLENGE PROBLEM
    What happens in a Pascal's Triangle if we first subtract and than add in a horizontal direction? Generalize for any row and prove. (Hint: Find out what nCk means and use it in your proof).
  •  
    17  
    24

    December

    Connections: What might integration mean in the mathematics classroom?

    1 FINALS: Presentations
    8 FINALS: Presentations

     

     

    Take time to do it right

    September 2005

     

     

    These pages are always under construction: I am trying to keep them up-to-date  with my activities :) Questions and/or comments are welcome!

    Maintained by:  Mara Alagic
    Mathematics Education
    Curriculum & Instruction Department
    Wichita State University
    Wichita, Kansas  67260-0028