Wichita State University
CI 402M ISAM: Elementary Mathematics
Instructor: Dr. Mara Alagic
Spring 2005
Faculty Member: Dr. Mara Alagic
Office: 205 Corbin Education Center
Office Hours: Tuesday & Wednesday 4:30 – 5 :30; other times by appointment
Telephone: (316) 978-6974
E-mail Address: mara.alagic@wichita.edu
Department: Curriculum and Instruction
Note: Weather Cancellations – Call 978-6633 (select 2) to obtain information on weather related class cancellations.
Course Title: CI 402M Instructional Strategies, Assessment and Management: Elementary Mathematics (3 credit hours)
Catalog Description: Students are introduced to the instructional and assessment decisions and processes necessary for meeting curriculum goals and objectives in the K-6 classroom. Students become familiar with various management strategies for building a positive classroom environment in which all children can achieve at their full potential. Students will further understand instruction, assessment, and management in the context of teaching elementary mathematics. Concurrent enrolment in CI 411M is required. Prerequisites: CI 311, 319, 320, 321, and 431A; CESP 334; Math 501.
Required Resources
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.(2000). Principles and Standards for School Mathematics. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. Reston, VA (also available online at http://standards.nctm.org/document/index.htm )
Math 501 textbook (any version)
Your Digital Resource File
Recommended Readings
National Research Council (2000). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
Daniels, H. & Bizar, M. (1998). Methods that matter: Six structures for best practice classrooms. York, ME: Stenhouse.
Supplies
Major Topics:
Professionalism and reflection as they relate to teaching of mathematics (PR)
Human development and diversity; Cognitive science: How people learn mathematics (HDD)
Connection of teaching experiences and assessment: formative and summative assessment (CTA)
Infusing technology throughout mathematics learning and teaching (T)
Content knowledge: Process and content standards for k-6 mathematics &
Mathematics related pedagogical content knowledge: teaching for understanding &
Alignment with standards: Lesson planning; Unit planning; Integration (CKS)
Collaboration in classroom and school environments (C)
|
Major Topics |
Guiding principles from Conceptual Framework |
|||||
|
PR |
HDD |
CTA |
T |
CKS |
C |
|
|
Professionalism and reflection as they relate to teaching of mathematics |
X |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Human development and diversity; Cognitive science: How people learn mathematics |
|
X |
|
|
|
|
|
Connection of teaching experiences and assessment: formative and summative assessment |
|
|
X |
|
|
|
|
Infusing technology throughout mathematics learning and teaching |
|
|
|
X |
|
|
|
Content knowledge: Process and content standards for k-6 mathematics |
|
|
|
|
X |
|
|
Mathematics related pedagogical content knowledge: teaching for understanding |
|
|
|
|
X |
|
|
Alignment with standards: Lesson planning; Unit planning; Integration |
|
|
|
|
X |
|
|
Collaboration in classroom and school environments |
|
|
|
|
|
X |
* http://webs.wichita.edu/depttools/DeptToolsMemberFiles/coedean/revisedCF_2_24_03.pdf
Technology Expectations:
Technology integration emphasis for this class are in italics in the list below.
CORE 2 students will be able to
Use common media storage systems such as CD-ROM and Zip disks.
Create hyperlinks and graphics in word processing documents.
Use electronic resources ethically.
Manipulate data in a spreadsheet program.
Use presentation software to make class presentations.
Use word processing or desktop publishing to create instructional materials or newsletters.
Use video projectors, VCR, projection devices, digital cameras, CD/DVD, calculators, and other common instructional technologies.
Trouble-shoot basic computer problems.
Evaluate electronic materials for accuracy, appropriateness, and credibility.
Use concept mapping technologies for planning or instruction.
Develop and use WebQuests.
Apply technology and content area standards related to technology to planning and management.
Research and apply strategies that support digital equity for all students. (Including assistive technologies)
Use multimedia to support instruction.
|
Learner Outcomes (Those shown in italics pertain specifically to Professional Education Standards) |
Related Assessment |
KSDE Professional Education |
KSDE Elementary Education Standards |
Conceptual Framework Connections (Guiding Principles) |
|
|
The student is a reflective professional who |
|||||
|
a)uses a variety of strategies for reflecting on his or her practice and the way that practice influences students’ learning and affects the interactions between student and educator. |
Practice Teacher Work Sample (PTWS)
|
S9-K1 |
|
PR, CTA |
|
|
b) is aware of the ethical standards that should guide the professional teacher’s interaction with all students, colleagues, parents, and members of the community. |
S13-K4 |
|
PR |
||
|
The student demonstrates the ability to use effective, developmentally appropriate instructional strategies to help all k-6 students learn and use their mathematical skills in many different situations and applications to solve real life problems. |
PTWS M Unit Final |
|
S2-P3 |
HDD |
|
|
The student knows human development and promotes the ideals of human diversity by |
|||||
|
a) understanding that students’ physical, social, emotional, moral, and cognitive development influences learning and knowing how to address these factors when making instructional decisions. |
PTWS |
S2-K3 |
|
HDD |
|
|
b) understanding that diversity, exceptionality, and limited English proficiency affect learning. |
S3-K2 |
|
HDD |
||
|
c) knowing about the process of second language acquisition and about strategies to support the learning of students whose first language is not English. |
S3-K3 |
|
HDD, CKS |
||
|
d)using a well-grounded framework for understanding cultural and community diversity and knowing how to learn about and incorporate students’ experiences, cultures, and community resources into instruction. |
S3-K5 |
|
HDD, CKS |
||
|
e) understanding how to promote self-motivation among all students. |
S5-K5 |
|
HDD |
||
|
f) understanding communication theory, language development, and the role of language in learning. |
S6-K1 |
|
HDD |
||
|
g) understanding how differences in culture, gender and exceptionality can affect communication in the classroom. |
S6-K2 |
|
HDD |
||
|
The student knows a variety of developmentally appropriate assessment tools that align with curriculum and instruction. |
Math Unit |
|
S2-K4 |
HDD |
|
|
The student uses diverse and developmentally appropriate assessments that align with curriculum and instruction. |
|
S2-P4 |
HDD |
||
|
The student connects teaching experiences with assessment by |
|||||
|
a) identifying differences in approaches to learning and performance and designing instruction that helps use students’ strengths as the basis for growth. |
PTWS |
S3-K1 |
|
CTA |
|
|
b) knowing how to enhance learning by using a wide variety of materials, including human and technological resources, primary documents and artifacts, texts, reference books, literature, and other print resources. |
S4-K3 |
|
CKS, T, HDD |
||
|
c) using knowledge about human motivation and behavior to develop strategies for organizing and supporting individual and group work. |
S5-K1 |
|
HDD, CKS |
||
|
d) using data from building, district, state, and national assessments to guide program development. |
S7-K4 |
|
CTA |
||
|
e) understanding the characteristics, uses, advantages, and limitations of different types of assessments for evaluating how students learn, what they know and are able to do, and what kinds of experiences will support their further growth and development. |
S8-K1 |
|
CTA |
||
|
f) knowing how to select, construct, and use assessment strategies and instruments appropriate to the learning outcomes being evaluated and to other diagnostic purposes. |
S8-K2 |
|
CTA |
||
|
The student is technologically skilled by knowing different kinds of technology tools and techniques and the roles these play |
|||||
|
in enriching learning opportunities, enhancing professional development, and facilitating professional productivity. |
PTWS |
S12-K1 K2, K3 |
|
PR , T
|
|
|
The teacher knows and understands the mathematical concepts of number sense, number systems and their properties, computation, geometric figures and their properties, transformational geometry, measurement, data analysis, data representations, probability, patterns, functions, and representations of algebraic and geometric situations/solutions. |
PTWS Math Unit |
|
S2-K1 |
CKS T |
|
|
The teacher understands the five process standards (problem solving, reasoning and proof, communication, connections and representations). |
PTWS MUnit |
|
S2-K2 |
CKS T |
|
|
Appropriate to students' age and development, the teacher can use and apply, demonstrate, and teach the concepts of number sense, number systems and their properties, computation, geometric figures and their properties, transformational geometry, measurement, data analysis, data representations, probability, patterns, functions, representations of algebraic and geometric situations/solutions. |
PTWS MUnit
|
|
S2-P3 |
HDD CKS T |
|
|
The teacher integrates the five process standards (problem solving, reasoning and proof, communication, connections and representations) into math instruction. |
PTWS MUnit |
|
S2-P4 |
HDD |
|
|
The student is knowledgeable about both content and pedagogy and how to align both with standards by |
|||||
|
a) understanding major concepts, assumptions, debates, and processes of inquiry, and ways of knowing that are central to the discipline being taught and can create opportunities that make these aspects of subject matter meaningful for all students. |
Practice Teacher Work Sample (PTWS)
|
S1-K1 |
|
CKS |
|
|
b) understanding how learning occurs and knowing how to use instructional strategies that promote learning for all students. |
S2-K1 |
|
HDD CTEA |
||
|
c) understanding principles and techniques associated with various instructional strategies. |
S4-K2 |
|
CKS |
||
|
d) knowing reading and thinking skills that pertain to learning a discipline and integrating that discipline into other content fields. |
S4-K4 S7-K3 S11-K3 |
|
CKS |
||
|
e) understanding the principles of effective classroom management and knowing strategies to promote positive relationships, cooperation, purposeful learning, and student productivity. |
S5, K3 K4 |
|
CKS |
||
|
f) knowing crises intervention strategies. |
S5-K6 |
|
HDD |
||
|
g) knowing and using effective verbal and non-verbal communication techniques. |
S6-K3, S6-K4 |
|
CKS |
||
|
h) understanding learning theory, subject matter, curriculum development, and student development and knowing how to use this knowledge in planning instruction to meet curriculum goals. |
S7-K1 |
|
CTA CKS HDD |
||
|
i) knowing how to plan instruction to create an effective bridge between curriculum goals and students’ experiences. |
S7-K2 |
|
CTA, CKS |
||
|
j) knowing the importance of aligning standards, goals, instruction, outcomes, and assessments. |
S8-K3 |
|
CKS, CTA |
||
|
k) having a depth of knowledge in his or her subject matter and knowing the importance of integrating knowledge from a discipline with other fields. |
S11-K1, K4 ST11-K2 |
|
CTA, CKS |
||
|
The student works collaboratively to understand how schools are organized and function within the larger community context and the importance of collaboration |
|||||
|
among all stakeholders to promote maximum learning. |
PTWS |
S10-K1, 2 |
|
C |
|
| Assignments are due by midnight of the due date. Please remember: NO late work is accepted. | |||
|
Assignments |
Assessment Tool and Points |
Due Dates |
Total Points |
|
Attendance and participation |
check list; |
ongoing |
75 |
|
Lesson Plans |
rubric; |
January 29; February 18 |
50 |
|
TICKLE Journal |
rubric; |
February 19 |
50 |
|
Self-Evaluations |
check list; |
February 19; |
45 |
|
Mathematics unit |
rubric; 30 pt |
February 24 |
30 |
|
PTWS - Practice Teacher Work Sample (paper copy)
with
and |
rubric; 5 sections |
May 5 |
195 |
|
rubric; 150 pt |
May 5 |
60 |
|
|
rubric; 35 pt |
May 5 |
18 |
|
|
Final exam |
rubric; 25 |
May 10 |
25 |
|
TOTAL |
|
|
|
|
Reading Assignments are graded in a variety of ways: as part of the participation, reflections, self-evaluations, final exam ... |
|
|
|
Grading:
|
Grading |
|
|
90% - 100% |
A |
|
80% - 89% |
B |
|
70% - 79% |
C |
|
60% - 69% |
D |
|
0% - 59% |
F |
Academic Honesty: A standard of honesty, fairly applied to all students, is essential to a learning environment. Students abridging a standard of honesty must accept the consequences; penalties are assessed by appropriate classroom instructors or other designated people. Serious cases may result in discipline at the college or University level and may result in suspension or dismissal. Dismissal from a college for academic dishonesty, constitutes dismissal from the University.(WSU Student Code of Conduct)
Special Needs: ADA: If you have a physical, perceptual, psychiatric/emotional, medical, or learning disability that may impact your ability to carry out assigned course work, contact the Office of Disability Services (DS), Grace Wilkie Annex, room 173. (Voice/TDD 978-3309). ODS will review your concerns, confirm your disability, and determine, with you, what accommodations are necessary. All information and documentation of your disability is confidential and will not be released by DS without your written permission
Educational Materials Resource: "Book fine policies are in effect for any materials checked out for this class from the Library Resource Center (LRC) at the Joyce Focht Instructional Support Center (USD 259), 412 S. Main, Wichita. All materials for this class must be returned and fines paid at the LRC by this semester's Study Day before grades for this class will be recorded. NOTE: At the time of check out at the LRC, you will be asked to give your name, WSU student identification number, and identify the appropriate WSU class and instructor's name."
Performance Assessment: Both the state of Kansas and national accreditation requires that university programs for the preparation of teachers and other school personnel be performance-based. In particular, this requires that program candidates not only pass required courses/attain certain GPAs, but also receive satisfactory ratings on certain required assessments, many of those embedded within program coursework.
One or more of these required assessments occur in this course. The title/description of such assessments and associate rubrics and passing criteria follow
[listing]
Practice Teacher Work Sample
Integrated Unit
Final Exam
Candidates failing to attain a satisfactory rating on a required assessment may be provided special assistance. For candidates failing to attain a satisfactory rating on required assessments, the university is not able to recommend licensure or endorsement and/or may not permit them to proceed in the program, even though they may receive an acceptable course grade or exceed minimum GPAs.
Lesson Plans
help
grading rubric
example from science
LESSON PLAN FORMAT:
Title
Name:
Date of Lesson:
Subject Area/Topic:
Grade level:
Standard(s):
Outcomes/Objectives:
Vocabulary:
Materials/Technology:
Procedure:
|
ENGAGE (into the idea, concept) EXPLORE (the idea/concept) EXPLAIN/Getting the Idea/Vocabulary introduction EXPAND/EXTEND/APPLY (the idea/concept) EVALUATE (understanding of the idea/concept) EXPAND/EXTEND/APPLY (2) |
FORMATIVE ASSESSMENT |
Identify concept development (concrete, pictorial, abstract) stages within the procedure.
Adaptations/Modification for students with disabilities and diverse learners
References (sources)
Reflection
Ideas for integration
NOTE: In terms of time management, learning cycle lesson can be delivered in two time slots - you can have ENGAGE - EXPLORE - EXPLAIN with formative assessment and continue next time with ENGAGE (just to connect with previous block) - EXPAND - EVALUATE ...
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
Title
(Use a question that would be appropriate to put at the board at the beginning of the day and it is not giving a way what you will be doing. Make sure to use words that students would understand. )
Name:
Date of Lesson:
Subject Area/Topic:
Grade level:
Standards: Look at the
grade level NCTM standards
Outcomes/Objectives:
Vocabulary
Materials/Technology :
Procedure:
(Please label concrete, pictorial, symbolic and/or abstract representations of the main idea/concept in the lesson procedure.)
ENGAGE (into the idea, concept)
(Focus, anticipatory set or hook, access prior knowledge or schemas. It can be an appropriate question, small story, discrepant event, ... )
EXPLORE (the idea/concept)
(Exploration is usually a concrete activity or experience that students will use in order to develop an understanding of a new idea. Sequence of events is very clear: grouping, handling of materials, instructions to students, ...)
EXPLAIN/Getting the Idea/Vocabulary introduction
(Students interpret the exploration in their own words. They report on their findings and collected data. Teacher guides discussion very carefully and with appropriate wait time between questions to allow for students thinking and developing of ideas.
- Plan for sharing student data/ideas needs to be clearly written
- Plan for teacher questioning that leads students to refine their ideas. Plan questions that will help you assess students understanding. Include expected answers.
- Plan for introduction of vocabulary)
EXPAND/EXTEND/APPLY (the idea/concept)
(The purpose is to provide practice with new ideas and vocabulary. If possible, it is good to connect it with real-life experiences, provide structured time for practice and/or explore the idea in a different context. Here are some ideas:
- Another activity
- Guided practice and/or
- Demonstration
- Worksheets offering some new view of the same idea
- Very important EXTENSION is INQUIRY in the classroom. When writing your Integrated unit in schools, you will be expected to write one INQUIRY lesson plan. This might be a good time to start thinking about it. If your Science Unit team is willing, you might try to put one of the lessons for the science unit into the INQUIRY format.)
EVALUATE (understanding of the idea/concept)
(The purpose is to evaluate student's understanding of the main idea/concept.
- Another activity
- Independent practice
- Demonstration
- Worksheets
- Journaling)
Ongoing/formative assessment has to be clearly described (as part of the procedure or separately). It is conducted during the process of instruction/learning to provide instructors/learners evaluative information useful in improving the instruction/learning.
Evaluation of the concept/idea understanding: Summative assessment is the assessment conducted at the end of a lesson (after EXPLORE and EXPAND for a certain concept or idea). In general terms, summative assessment is conducted at the end of a lesson, unit or a course to provide instructor/learners with judgments about their performance. )EXPAND/EXTEND/APPLY (2)
(To reach a good understanding of an idea, concept or a process, students need appropriate practice. Include in this part just a brief idea for another expansion. This might be a good place to think about possible follow-up inquiry lesson.)
Identify concept development stages
Adaptations/Modification for students with disabilities and diverse learners
References (sources)
(Use APA style. Include standards book(s) and all other sources that you have been using in order to write this lesson plan.)
Reflection
(What makes this a good lesson plan? What are possible concerns? How are you going to address them?)
Ideas for integration
(If you are writing a
science lesson, suggest ideas for integrating mathematics.
If you are writing a mathematics lesson,
suggest ideas for integrating science .
Including other ideas about integration is optional but welcomed.)
| points | excellent | mediocre | acceptable | ||
|
I N D I V I D U A L
L
P |
Title, name, date, subject, grade level |
5 |
All elements present; Title appropriate | Some elements incomplete | Elements missing, title giving away the idea |
| Standards |
10 |
Process and content standards are appropriate to the lesson, clearly and completely stated. | Standards are somewhat appropriate to the lesson. | Standards incomplete or inappropriate for the lesson | |
| Outcomes and Objectives |
15 |
Objectives describe what students are likely to accomplish; main idea and vocabulary included. | Objectives and vocabulary are somewhat unrelated to the lesson | Objectives are not appropriate to the lesson and vocabulary is incomplete. | |
| Materials/Technology |
5 |
All important materials included. | Obvious item missing | Several items missing. | |
|
Procedure: Logical order
(learning cycle): Content quality |
15 |
Clear and logical sequence, includes management, e.g., division into groups and distribution of materials | Logical sequence, but not too clear. Management parts might be missing | Parts of the plan missing or the order inappropriate | |
|
Procedure: Questioning Content quality |
10 |
Questioning sequence likely to guide class sharing in a logical progression; obvious connection to the main idea | Questions are isolated pieces; connection to main idea unclear | Questions are random; no connection to main idea | |
|
Procedure: Representation labels Content quality |
10 |
Concrete, pictorial, and abstract representations correctly and consistently | Representations unclear or incomplete | Not correctly represented or missing | |
|
Procedure: Assessment/evaluation plan
Inquiry (expand (2)) Content quality |
10 + 7 |
Includes ongoing assessment that fits the lesson plan; relates to the main idea included; inquiry included | Assessment fits the lesson, but not ongoing; not all elements complete | Assessment does not fit the lesson or main idea and is not ongoing; some elements incomplete | |
| References |
3 |
Included | |||
|
Reflection Ideas for integration |
7 + 3 |
Shows thought about the value of the lesson and possible areas of concern. | Beginning to show thought | Shows little thought; generic. | |
| a | TOTAL |
100 |
a | a | a |
| TICKLE: Teacher's Inquiry into Children's Knowledge and Learning Evolvement |
|
Consent Form available here.
Purpose
Objectives
Overview
Each student will inquire into the learning of a child between the ages of 6 and 12 and complete two related assignments. The topic of the first assignment is volume. The second topic is fractions.
Requirements
Submitted assignment has to include a parent-signed permission form and supporting documentation (lesson plan, videotape, child's work, if appropriate).
|
TICKLE rubric |
Exceptional |
Proficient |
Developing |
|
Describe the child you interview. (5pt) |
All details clearly and succinctly included. |
One or two elements missing |
More than two elements missing |
|
A narrative includes evidence of your teaching style and child’s responses. Make sure to include your interpretation of responses to the probing questions. (20pt) |
The narrative has a good flow (parallel with the tape); interpretations included at all significant places and well supported. |
The narrative flow not completely parallel with the tape; or interpretations random; or, not completely supported |
The narrative flow not completely parallel with the tape; interpretations random; and not supported |
|
Give careful attention to details about (a) teaching the child something new and (b) assessing child's understanding. (20 pt) |
Detailed evidence from narrative provided to support conclusions both in a. and b. |
Most of the statements supported for both a. and b. |
Only some statements are supported |
|
Explain what you learned about (a)the child (5pt) and (b) the child's understanding of the concept (10pt) |
Detailed evidence from narrative provided to support conclusions both in a. and b. |
Most of the statements supported for both a. and b. |
Only some statements are supported |
|
Describe where exactly your lesson fits in DRF sequence/scaffold. What could you teach your child next time? What would be appropriate to teach before your lesson plan? (20pt) |
Scaffolding sequence logically ordered without too big gaps; If gaps are “big” provide appropriate reflection. |
Scaffolding sequence only partially logically ordered. |
Scaffolding sequence unclear. |
|
Explain what you learned about (a) teaching in general (10pt) and (b) teaching volume/fractions (PCK) (10pt) |
At least two attributes are explicated for each of the concepts, explained and supported. |
At least one attribute for each concept - explained and supported. |
No attributes recognized or no support provided. |
|
Include supporting documentation: video tape and a lesson plan. Include evaluation documentation/artifacts if available. These are required elements for this assignment to be graded. |
|||
You may choose your own format but it needs to include enough detail for me to understand how you are progressing in this class; at least one paragraph long report on each of the following questions. For the full number of points, question #1 will probably require more than one paragraph - select concepts that you find most significant, and go from there...:
What did I learn? Be very specific and give enough details. Think about this as being a test on what you have learned so far. Or, if you do not like tests, consider this a journal entry about the pedagogical content knowledge that you have acquired so far. Carefully select what you want to write about. Remember to support your statements.
What would I like to learn/change? be very specific. Include dispositions (both for yourself and me).
The following two weeks I will focus on . . . What can YOU do to enhance your learning related to this class? Include dispositions (both for yourself and me).
What is your point-average at this moment? How do you feel about it? (Attach a spreadsheet with your grades.)
~ guidelines ~
Working in a cooperative group, each student will be asked to prepare a lesson plan as a part of the unit. Topic will be determined in the classroom. The cooperative groups will be teaching portions of their unit in class.
o The group will agree on a topic and decide on individual lessons that provide a range of approaches to the topic. The lesson assigned to each group member should emphasize that person's assigned Process Standard. Communication standard has to be incorporated within all lesson plans.
o The group will also prepare a cover page that includes
§ Theme, names, … (see rubric below)
§ Rationale for the unit; how each lesson fits into the unit, and
§ Unit reflection (see rubric below)
o The group will choose one of the lessons to present as a 15-20 minute micro-teach. (It is understood that the lesson may have to be modified to fit the time requirement.) Each person should have an active part in peer microteaching.
o Submissions: Electronic format (a) a complete unit in one piece (for the web) AND (b) 4 (5) separate pieces: cover pages and each lesson separately (for grading).
MATH UNIT Evaluation
Name _____________________________________________________
|
|
|
points |
exceptional |
proficient |
developing |
|
G R O U P W |
Title/Theme List of content (names, titles) Learning Goals Vocabulary; Integration ideas |
10 |
All elements present; rich vocabulary; creative integration ideas; Types and levels of learning goals described. | Some components incomplete | Some components missing |
|
Unit reflection/Rationale:
Why is this a good unit? How these lessons fit together? What they accomplish? |
10 |
Clear description of each lesson's place in the unit; Clear goal of the unit. Potential concerns identified and resolutions suggested. | Description lacks necessary detail. | Some components incomplete | |
|
Unit: Completeness, organization, range of lessons |
10 |
All lessons have all components; Each lessons brings a unique element to the unit; Variety of tools (ICT, manipulatives)/ | Description lacks necessary detail OR unnecessary repetition present | Some components incomplete; Repetition | |
|
Presentation: |
10 |
All members have a balanced part in the presentation; Good use of time; shared distribution of ongoing assessment | Presentation shows lack of specific attention to every single component | Lesson has not been planned well enough to meet all the requirements. | |
|
|
|||||
| Group total |
40 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Individual Lesson Plan |
60 |
|
|
|
|
|
Unit total |
100 |
|
|
|
PTWS: Practice Teacher Work Sample
A Teacher Work Sample is a performance assessment in which a teacher or a teacher candidate provides evidence of his or her ability to facilitate learning.
What we are doing is Practice Teacher Work Sample so that you develop skills to do TWS, when necessary. Rubrics, directions and requirements are adaptations of work from the Renaissance Partnership for Improving Teacher Quality Project (http://fp.uni.edu/itq).
Guide to Practice Teacher Work Sample:
Practice Teacher Work Sample is a written document that includes
A. Integrated unit (4 mathematics lessons; language arts integration explicit; other integration ideas included)
B. Written documentation organized according to the following sections (if you click on the section title you will be able to access an outline for that section):
|
|
|
|
|
Renaissance Partnership for Improving Teacher Quality Project: http://fp.uni.edu/itq |
|
|
Renaissance Teacher Work Samples (RTWS): http://fp.uni.edu/itq/RTWS/index.htm |
|
|
Scored TWS Exemplars Produced by Student Teachers : http://fp.uni.edu/itq/Scored_TWS/index.htm |
DEVELOPING INTEGRATED UNITS of
STUDY
The Interdisciplinary Concept Model
Each student will prepare
an integrated unit on a theme that is determined in consultation with their
cooperating teacher. The unit will include 3 lesson plans focusing on
mathematics standards and integrating language arts. Grading rubric is
available (see below).
|
|
Choose a topic (an organizing theme) |
Does the topic interest you as a teacher? Interest your students? Does it fit in with your local and state outcomes/standards? Is it aligned with your curriculum?
|
|
Brainstorm
with students
about this topic (a strategy for assessment of prior knowledge - before the first lesson, first lesson or part of the first lesson; Begin with general question and follow with more specific ones, if necessary)
|
||||||
|
|
Classification by concept
is done after
brainstorming - You need to group together concepts that have similar
characteristics. For example, if the theme is "Colors in nature"
you can group together colors of plants, animals, ... (
For K-2 you need to do it;
Upper
levels: have students categorize) |
||||||
|
|
Brainstorm
across the curriculum
(or Subject
Matter Areas) as a theme that goes across all disciplines: Language Arts,
Social Studies, Art, Music, Science, Math, Teaching and Learning
Strategies |
||||||
|
|
Find activities: The integrated unit is a set of THREE lessons that are related by a single theme. Each lesson could be a separate Learning Cycle, or two or more lessons will be combined in each Learning Cycle. For instance, the Engage, Explore and Explain could constitute one lesson; next lesson might be found as Expand/Evaluate. | ||||||
|
|
Formulate Guiding Questions for the Unit |
The purpose of the questions is to direct the unit by posing higher level thinking questions (according to Bloom's taxonomy). These questions are for the teacher.
|
|
Find activities to Help the Students to Answer the Guiding Questions - |
The activities should answer the guiding questions. Eliminate activities that are not developmentally appropriate and that are not in district standards.
Adapted from:
Ackerman, D., Hays Jacobs, H., & Perkins, D. (1989). Interdisciplinary
curriculum: Design and implementation. Alexandria, VA: ASCD.
Evaluation
(Please turn this page in with your integrated unit)
Name ______________________________________________________
| possible points |
your points |
||
|
|
2 points | ||
|
|
5 points | ||
|
|
5 points | ||
|
|
5 points | ||
|
|
5 points | ||
|
|
5 points |
||
|
|
5 points | ||
|
|
120 points | ||
| TOTAL possible points | 150 points |
|
Adapted from: Ackerman, D., Hayes Jacobs, H. & Perkins, D. (1989) Interdisciplinary Curriculum: Design and Implementation. Alexandria, VA: ASCD.
Final Exam: Reflecting on two essential questions about teaching and learning mathematics:
1. Where do you see your teaching in the continuum of teaching methodologies? Explain.
Expository (Direct)----------Guided Inquiry------------Free Discovery
2.
How
will multiple diverse perspectives enhance the teaching of mathematics in your
classroom?
|
January 2005 |
|
|
|
These pages are always under construction: I am trying to keep them up-to-date with my activities :) Questions and/or comments are welcome! |
Maintained by:
Mara Alagic |